I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 because the conventional news have actually guaranteed really people that are few the detail of this “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought to never have now been arrested in britain in the beginning since there is no situation, with no investigation that is genuine. Check this out and also you will understand why.
One other thing perhaps not commonly recognized can there be is not any JURY in a rape test in Sweden and it’s also a sex chat sexcamly SECRET TEST. All the evidence, most of the witnesses, are heard in key. No public, no jury, no news. The only real general public component is the charging and also the verdict. There is certainly a judge and two advisers straight appointed by governmental parties. So that you never ever would get to know exactly how clearly the full situation is a stitch-up. Unless you look at this.
You can find therefore numerous inconsistencies in Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate attack against Julian Assange. Nevertheless the key question which leaps down at me personally – and which strangely We have maybe not seen asked any place else – is this:
Why did Anna Ardin maybe perhaps maybe not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood when you look at the Swedish team around Assange when it comes to shocking red cashmere sweater she had used right in front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange had been intending to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who had been interested in Assange:
“He’s maybe not right here. He’s planned to own intercourse aided by the cashmere woman every evening, although not managed to get. Perhaps he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that just three days earlier in the day, on 13 August, she was indeed intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she ended up being prepared to take to (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s entire life. She had been additionally to mention that this attack included enforced sex that is unprotected she had been concerned with HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced unsafe sex on the and also this might have sent HIV, why did she make no try to warn Sofia Wilen that Wilen was at risk of her life? And just why ended up being Ardin talking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about this to buddies, without any disapproval that is evident discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information and even had organised her registration for the press meeting. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Why don’t we fit that into a tremendously brief survey associated with the entire Ardin/Assange relationship.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for a press meeting organised with a branch associated with the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat for him in which to stay as she’s going to be away.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s supper with Assange and they’ve got consensual intercourse, from the very first day’s conference. Ardin subsequently alleges this converted into attack by surreptitious mutilation regarding the condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press assistant. She sits next to him regarding the dais at their press meeting. Assange fulfills Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a party that is crayfish anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This try to find a party that is crayfish, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early morning. Another proposes to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless during the party that is crayfish Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting out-of-doors at 02:00 and barely freezing aided by the world’s coolest smartest people, it’s amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, in accordance with both their authorities testimonies, rest once more in identical solitary sleep, and continue doing so for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have sexual intercourse; Anna tells police they cannot. That night, Anna and Julian get together to, and then leave together from, a supper aided by the leadership of this Pirate Party. They again sleep into the bed that is same.
16 August: Julian would go to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin will not alert her of possible assault that is sexual. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once again declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say she’s concerned about STD’s including HIV after unsafe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague on a single ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to just just take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s that is unrecorded breach of procedure – police interview. Krans makes a declaration Assange that is accusing of. Wilen does not want to signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own authorities declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight times formerly.
Some times later on: Ardin creates a broken condom towards the authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA it is apparently unused on it, and indeed.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s interview that is ardin-arranged Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead to not whine of a attack, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration alleging rape, that was drafted by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
It is ordinary this 1 of a couple of things took place:
Ardin had been intimately assaulted with unsafe sex, but did not alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also continued to host Assange, help him, can be found in public and personal with him, behave as his press assistant, and sleep in the same sleep with him, refusing duplicated proposes to allow for him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after offering him making use of her one sleep flat while she had been away. By her very own admission, she had sex that is consensual him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for sex with Wilen, and seems at the least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after non-safe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning feminist buddy, policewoman Irmeli Krans, so that you can twist Wilen’s tale in to a sexual assault – quite easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape legislation. Wilen refused to signal.
During the authorities section on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did not require to place any fees against JA nevertheless the authorities desired to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted that she ended up being “shocked if they arrested JA because I just desired him to have a test”.
The next night at 22.22 she texted “it had been law enforcement whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then composed her story that is own of attack. As a lot of buddies knew she ended up being making love with Assange, she could perhaps perhaps not claim non-consensual intercourse. So she manufactured her tale to fit right in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event of this torn condom. Nevertheless the condom that is torn produced does not have any trace of Assange upon it. It really is impractical to wear a condom rather than keep a DNA trace.
No difficulty is had by me in stating that We securely believe Ardin to be always a liar. On her tale to be real involves acceptance of behaviour that is, when you look at the literal feeling, amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you’re never ever expected to see all of this detail. Rape trials in Sweden take place completely in key. There’s absolutely no jury, and also the national government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed directly by governmental events. If Assange visits Sweden, he’ll disappear completely into prison, the test is likely to be key, as well as the the next thing you are going to hear is the fact that he is responsible and a rapist.
Next, needless to say, it doesn’t matter the data is really poor, as simply to cry rape is always to tarnish a man’s reputation forever. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in destroying most of the ongoing work and life of Assange. The main points of this tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to check out evidence. That she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro groups in Havana and Miami if you are not allowed to know who the accuser is, how can you find out?
Finally, to those of good use idiots whom declare that how you can test these things is with in court, i might say needless to say, you will be right, we must trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, so we should definitely condemn the disgraceful behavior of the whom campaigned for the Birmingham Six.